When The Single Is A Jingle: Artists Forced To Take The Ad Man's Dollar
Adam Narkiewicz, August 8th, 2008 09:45
With record sales plummeting, more and more musicians are being forced to look to to advertising to pay the bills. Adam Narkiewicz investigates

This one time, Gruff Rhys was telling me about the time Coca Cola was trying to buy 'Hello Sunshine' to use in an advert. The band, hardly rich, mortgages to pay and babies on the way, kept saying no. Coca Cola kept coming back, zero stacking on top of zero, until there six of those terrible things, and the band nearly split up.
They never gave in though. Those death squads meant more than those zeroes. An admirable attitude, but one that's increasingly rare, increasingly antiquated in the modern cultural landscape, where everything is for sale, at a plummeting cost. In the early 1990s a spot in a Levis ad could net a mill plus - even as recently as 2003 Mogwai got $250,000 for flogging 'Summer' to the jeans brand. Nowadays they'd be lucky to get $20,000. Split that five ways and see how many months rent you're looking at.
But with record sales falling lower than the common denominator, the doors are off the hinges, and "my sweet love" has been ousted as the musician's chief muse, in favour of "my sweet Dove", or whatever. Bands are falling over themselves to provide a suitably whimsical backdrop for the latest phone ad, while brands are ripping through rappers quicker than Violet Elizabeth. Last year Kanye West, Nas, Rakim, and super-conscious political emcee KRS 1 were commissioned to make a song for Nike. More recently Smirnoff paid handsomely for the services of KRS and DJ Premier (an unrepentant KRS noted he made more off that one song than his last four albums combined), while Julian Casablancas hooked up with Pharell and Santagold last month on Converse's buck, to miserable effect.
Some of these songs bear little lyrical relation to the companies that pay for them. Some do. A worrying trend to emerge recently has been that of the four -minute jingle disguised as pop song. Some are as transparent as they are manically risible - earlier this year shampoo brand Fructis invented a Pussycat Dolls styled band called Code Green and hooked them up with perennial laughing stock and Rocafella weed-carrier Memphis Bleek for the brazen 'Fructis Flow', on which Jay'Z's protege raps, "you know just how I do / I can run my fingers through / strong all day it replenish your glow / it turn that dull into soft so girl tell that frizz to get lost".
Others are sneakier. Chris Brown's 'Forever' had been on the charts since May until the song was revealed as a Wrigley's ad ("double your pleasure/double your fun" goes the hook), causing a wave of outrage across ye olde internets - although some were quick to point out the idiocy present in much of the clamour. "He definitely already works for a huge multinational mega-corporation," noted Popwatch. "It's called Sony BMG. Every time you hear a Chris Brown song on the radio, you are hearing a work of popular art which is also an ad: A catchy piece of sound designed to convince you to hand over your money to a rich executive somewhere."
Critics have been quick to point a misguided finger at rap - hip-hop having been on sale since 'My Adidas', after all - but with Groove Armada now officially financed by Bacardi, The Spice Girls' albums selling exclusively through Victoria's Secret, The White Stripes flogging cars and new EMI boss Guy Hands calling for bands to be sponsored "like football teams", don't expect anybody's morals to last for long. We're in a recession, after all.
"Adverts always annoyed me," says former Boo Radley Martin Carr, who until this year ran a strictly no-ads policy with regards to his songs. "I always wanted to create things that were opposite of what an advert was - not that I think they demean the song, I just didn't wanna be in there with everyone else, trying to sell you something... now I've changed my mind, for the same reason. I'm doing it because I need the money. There's been a huge sea change from when I was 20, there was a definite movement that wasn't involved with major labels, wasn't involved with advertising. That was an anathema. Now it's accepted, nobody cares. I still feel regret about it, but I've got more important things to worry about. Having a kid and finding somewhere to live."
Someone's gotta keep your favourite artist in pie and Pampers. And if you downloading swine aren't gonna pay for their services anymore, well, Ronald McDonald might. Even I, moral-high-ground-hogging toolbox that I am, took some Greek bank's buck for a song last year. Shit, Kiddie rap Svengali Jermaine Dupri just launched a record label with TAG. But all the deodorant in the world won't disguise the stench of the music industry's fetid corpse. The horse got flogged into lunch-meat a long time ago.
Aug 8, 2008 10:47pm
Welcome to the future of music. It sucks balls. For cash.
Aug 14, 2008 9:06am
When my band stopped making enough money to live on I started writing orchestral music with the sole end purpose of it being used on ads. From my point of view it's all about learning, experimenting with new challenges and being surrounded by music which is a nice way to make a living. I've never watched an ad with my music in or even thought about adverts, I just worry about the music and am thankful when I get paid. The only moral limitation I have is the music being used for military recruitment or the Republican Party.
For me music was always mainly about the selfish enjoyment of trying to create good music. Overall I prefer working for the broadcast industry than fans, because although fans care more, they are fickle and/or want to keep you in a genre box, where the broadcast industry offers endless fresh musical challenges and is more reliable for a pay cheque.
Also you don't have to worry about being cool or uncool in the eyes of journalists - a bit of a sad adolescent situation to be in when you're just trying to do something you love. I think a naturally cool band is a rare thing - really it's all edifice - clothes, pouts, poses, posturing and moody lighting - all of which has little to do with the craft of making music. With making music for ads your best work makes money and the worst is forgotten about and no one really judges you ad hominem.
Really I think the whole angle of this article is like the last desperate cough of a long lost idealistic adolescence in which 'men in suits' i.e. people over 30 with jobs, are evil and the kids, the punks will rule the world with er, vegetarian anarchy. But as you said yourself Adam, you even happily took a bank's money for your own song so you know the score. So I say let's all grow up, accept that the punk revolution is dead and try to make a living...
Aug 20, 2008 11:44am
Hi, really excellent and fascinating article - I came over to have a look after you were featured in the The Guardian music blog, and I'm enjoying the site very much so far.
The one that made me raise my eyebrows when I heard it was Primal Scream's "Come Together", believing Bobby Gillepsie to be a long-signed-up member of the anti-capitalist movement.
Well done to Super Furries in a way and, "You Fools!", in another - did the brand make a difference to them? Coke being yer archytypal American EVILCORPORATEMACHINE brand. I'm yet to hear the Boo Radleys in an ad, though I did here them on the soundtrack of So, I Married An Axe Murderer, on telly the other week - covering "There She Goes", so a share with Lee Mavers then. The point about Chris Brown is well-made and when Radiohead named their video compilation 12 Television Commercials (or however many), it was the cleverest thing they've ever said. Someone I know who works in advertising says it's common practice to search the music upload site Garageband for near equivalents to songs/sounds they'd like to use but can't afford: garageband asks artists to add keywords to their music like happy and also asks them who they sounds like, which I guess is great for this purpose.
I don't think you can argue with what Dan P says as he has the experience. I had thought that one band who might be immune would be The Beatles, who surely don't need the money, and - sentimental, hypocritical and crapulous the thought may be - I was sad to hear their tunes were now available. Has anyone coughed up for a Beatles tune yet? I haven't seen/heard one?



















Cat Power
Britney Spears
Coldplay
The Killers
The Bronx
Skeletons
Aug 8, 2008 11:22am
Pretty often, if a musician is offered a huge sum for one of their tracks, and the musician turns the agency / product down, the agency will then threaten to hire a jingles company who can expertly rip off the track (with enough changes not to get sued), so their track will get used wether they like it or not - without any compensation for the musician at all.
Owen Pallet / Final Fantasy is an excellent person to speak to about this subject:
"In 2007, the song "This Is The Dream Of Win & Regine" was used in a commercial for Wiener Stadtwerke without Pallett's permission. Instead of litigation, Pallett and his booking agent Susanne Herrndorff approached the company for sponsorship for a music festival of their curation. The resultant Maximum Black Festival featured Final Fantasy, The Dirty Projectors, Deerhoof, Frog Eyes, Max Tundra, Six Organs Of Admittance and others. It played Vienna, Berlin and London."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owen_Pallett
Reply to this Admin