The Quietus - A new rock music and pop culture website

Black Sky Thinking

Black Sky Thinking: The Joy Division Industry Chris Roberts, April 10th, 2008 16:35

Add your comment »

Next to the beans, luv

More offcuts from the factory, by Chris Roberts Unknown Groceries illustration by Stuart Green, Ian Curtis illustration by Paul English

Excuse my poor posture, but I'm crushed under the weight of the Joy Division memorabilia that currently dominates the world of "alternative" culture, though whether the adjective "alternative" remains apposite in 2008 is open to question. Outside your window another Best Of is looming, tapping, trying to get in. Nipping out for a pint of milk, you'll trip over the heavily-marketed DVD release of Anton Corbijn's Control, while a slight detour for a paper will mean circumnavigating the promotional material for a new Grant Gee documentary, Joy Division, out on May 2nd. All this would be, if irritating, at least standard in the modern climate, were it not for the fact that an ocean of Joy Division stuff already floods the racks.

The band made just two albums proper - Unknown Pleasures and Closer. Yet a pattern for what was to follow was set as soon as Ian Curtis died in 1980, with Factory Records, nothing if not 24-hour self-promoters and smart myth-makers, rushing out Still. And still the myth grew, with even the consistently beery, laddish fartings of New Order failing to halt the traction. (I interviewed Bernard Sumner a long, long time ago. The first words this poetic man of mystery said to me, as Paula Yates walked past, were "Fuckin' hell mate, I fuckin' wouldn't mind fuckin' that.")

There have been innumerable compilations, box sets, radio sessions, TV docs, books and biographies, not to mention the albums Live at ULU, Live At Factory Manchester, and (and here's an album title you never got from Elvis) Live At High Wycombe. In fact, 20 albums in total. Thirty years on, Joy Division are more omnipresent than ever. The initially well-meant canonisation of Curtis - and Tony Wilson - has become a boom industry rather than a cult. Half Man Half Biscuit long ago prophetically lampooned this with a song about Joy Division oven gloves. And recently the biscuit was well and truly taken by Nike, who released Joy Division trainers. Yes, that certainly captures the essence of the music.

With Converse meriting equally scathing criticism for their appropriation of Kurt Cobain, it's clear that the icons of "independent" or "non-mainstream" culture are now as exploited and exploitable as the traditional "classic" beardy Sixties relics who've been resurrected as staples by the monthly music mags (this month: Bob Dylan Breathes! Next month: Brian Wilson coughs!) Yet Joy Division are rapidly becoming to today what Al Gore's green campaigning was eighteen months ago (before Live Earth rather punctured its cool): you don't want to disrespect the source because the heart is in the right place, yet the constant in-your-face hagiography is at best rather tasteless, at worst nauseating.

Peter Saville's original artwork for Unknown Pleasures successfully evoked the outsider, the existential who'd read a bit of Camus or Kafka and felt ill-matched with society. It dovetailed sublimely with Curtis' angst. Nowadays, it's become just another logo, brand stamp, gang tag.

"The more that time moves on, the more I have to say about Joy Division", writes Paul Morley, as a timely compilation of his own pieces on Joy Division emerges. One doesn't doubt that he was there at the beginning, and indeed that what he (along with photographers) saw in the four almost accidentally great post-punk boys has set the blueprint for what everyone else has seen in them since. But it's no coincidence that his writings, which have been in existence for decades, are only now collated by a publisher. With Ian's widow Deborah Curtis' memoir Touching From A Distance the source for the Control movie, others have felt compelled to recall their own brushes with Ian. Tony Wilson's ex-wife Lindsay Reade collaborates with journalist Mick Middles on Torn Apart - The Life Of Ian Curtis. "To be frank, he did his bit, we did our bits, and that was that", muses Peter Hook. "It always feel strange when people try to read so much into every lyric." We're just questioning the relentless cash-cow filleting of a now over-familiar tale here. It'd be straining for effect to try to belittle the flashes of genius in Joy Division's actual (very limited) output. It's true, though, that Curtis' voice was that of a Bowie fan, his dancing that of an Iggy fan. Other fine groups of the era didn't receive equal acclaim, and that's undeniably because they didn't (like Curtis, or later Cobain) die at just the right time to become a legend/martyr/saint. The Sound and The Comsat Angels made superior albums, as did The Bunnymen. But if you were on Factory, you got more coverage, because the Southern press were suckers for the "Northern = working class cred" card. And still are: see the completely rubbish Oasis, who fooled almost everyone. One shudders to think that if a Gallagher had died a few years ago, Oasis would be fallaciously credited with talent.

The motives of artistically-inclined individuals are perfectly acceptable. The director of the new documentary film, Grant Gee, comments winningly, "In 1980, aged 15, I bought a copy of Unknown Pleasures. It was the single most beautiful object I'd ever possessed and the first record I'd ever heard that didn't just spit out sounds but seemed to create a whole new landscape. A couple of months later, listening in bed to John Peel's radio show, I heard that the band's singer Ian Curtis had killed himself and I experienced a brand new/strange sense of adolescent loss..."

But are Joy Division truly as "influential" as, for example, The Gang Of Four? For better or worse, more bands rip off the latter's rhythms than dare to venture anywhere near Curtis' self-exposure, and those that do sonically echo him - Editors, say - take just the sheen, the rumble, without the guts, heart or soul.

When I asked the musician-turned-actor Sam Riley, who superbly played Curtis in Control if he was a Curtis fan, here's what he said. "No, not really. Other people I knew were, and of course Joy Division get played in indie discos all over the place. But...it wasn't that I ignored or disliked them, it was just it never really came in my direction. I only used to listen to 'Transmission', if I'm honest. Yeah, the most obvious one, with that "dance to the radio" hook..."

Riley, like the rest of us, wouldn't be able to move now without something about (if not by) Joy Division coming in his direction. "It's a delicate balance", Riley added. "I have respect for Ian Curtis, but not reverence. I definitely didn't want to play him as an icon. He wasn't an ideal husband or father. Even if you're an icon to a lot of people, you still have to go to the toilet. That's real life."

Leave ’em wanting more, they say. Curtis did. The vultures, however, keep forcing another plate into our faces. The music was about emotional starvation. We're gorged.


Mark Pringle
Apr 16, 2008 4:46pm

Great piece. I think we've got to get used to the idea that ANTHING can be commodified these days. The Throbbing Gristleā„¢ Range at Top Shop, anyone?

Reply to this Admin

Robin Murray
Apr 16, 2008 5:08pm

I'm struggling to see the point of this piece... a few needless digs at Factory, a few general (if obvious) points about youth culture but little else. Oh and the rather absurd assertion that Factory were covered over their peers purely because of working class cred. Bravo, mate!

Reply to this Admin

Emily Dover
Apr 12, 2008 1:03pm

There needs no ghost come from the grave to tell us this.

Reply to this Admin

monchberter
Apr 16, 2008 8:41pm

As an aside, i reckon Joy Division are the only band in the kingdom of guitar music it's 'safe' to profess a liking to to anyone at any time.

Pretty much no other band can garner as much universal respect as them.

Go on, name one. I bet you can't think of a single other band that someone - anyone - thinks isn't or worth the respect. Joy Division trump all comers.

And i seriously cannot bring myself to be bothered about them, ok, so I 'respect' them, but as to actually dislike them? Impossible.

Reply to this Admin

monchberter
Apr 16, 2008 10:52pm

http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/04/rock_martyrs.html someone at the Grauniad pinching ideas already?

Reply to this Admin

CONSTANCE R DILLON
Apr 17, 2008 6:17am

I love the irony of a guy bemoaning the constant round of joy division articles and merchandise by the adding to the pile !!!!! by the way all those other groups you mentioned are shit

Reply to this Admin

Gusling
Apr 18, 2008 3:52pm

Interesting article. I must say Ive been similarly disturbed by the sheer volume of JD iconography you tend to see on a daily basis and reminds us, as Mark Pringle says, that anything is liable to be deterriorialised. Not so sure about the comparison with The Sound + The Comsat Angels, who are a lot more sonically similar to each other than either are to Joy Division. While its not necessarily a bad thing to act as revisionist where appropriate, and although it is a shame when good bands are overlooked, any grounds for comparison seem plastered on in order to demean JD. The musical reference points of JDs music are much more expansive than either The Sound or The Comsat Angels, both of whom sound considerably dated now in comparison (especially in terms of vocal delivery and production). I dont think its especially fair to condemn Joy Division for some obscure contextualised reason (i.e Northern credibility) - such a thing may have been significant at the time, but wouldnt be sufficient to explain the bands continuing popularity. (Also, theres the funny problem of the media complaining about media proliferation!) But I do agree with the general point...to think of all the forms that his image and the music have been sublimated and diverted into that are seem so utterly distanced and disconnected is hard to stomach. :)

Reply to this Admin

Smells
Apr 20, 2008 3:15pm

gang of four are NOT influential.

That's just deaf critics who think that.

I remember when they were going on about Franz Ferdinand being influenced by Gang Of Four...ha !

Killing Joke, Stranglers, Buzzcocks are more influential that Gof4

Reply to this Admin

Ned R.
Apr 21, 2008 12:06am

I've been wondering about the flood of rereleases myself -- I only picked up two of the three recent reissues because a friend (who was THERE, man! etc.) recommended the live albums very much, and since I had store credit to burn at Amoeba in LA.

With time Sumner in particular becomes a far more interesting character to me, quoted comment in the piece and all -- the accidental frontman who has now done far, far more than Curtis ever did but who has a lower profile still.

Reply to this Admin

hobbes
Apr 24, 2008 1:47pm

New Balance did the Joy Division trainers, not Nike.
They're based in the North West which might explain why they imagined there was a link.
Not that it makes a difference to your point, but you know, research is everything.

Reply to this Admin

John Doran
Apr 24, 2008 2:46pm

Research is everything Pip.

Here are the Nike trainers that Chris is talking about:

http://www.cerysmaticfactory.info/joy_division_trainers.html

Reply to this Admin

Black Sky Thinking: The trouble with Radio 4’s new direction
May 9, 2008 4:07pm

[...] Ronson and Robbie Williams on the hunt for UFOs; and Simon Armitage raising his right arm to give the bloated corpse of Ian Curtis a weary flogging. All of these felt entirely out of place, far better suited to 6music or Radios 2 or 3, while Paul [...]

Reply to this Admin

Perhaps the last Joy Division story anyone needs « Ned Raggett Ponders It All
May 15, 2008 11:27pm

[...] 15, 2008 — Ned Raggett This is positively meant, BTW, but I’m beginning to agree with Chris Roberts’ piece in The Quietus about the cultural overload with the band of late. Jon Savage — who admittedly has helped contribute to the overload, which he wouldn’t [...]

Reply to this Admin

Dead Horse Flogging With Sid Vicious at the Camden Stables Market
Jul 4, 2008 12:47pm

[...] his piece for the Quietus on The Joy Division industry, Chris Roberts observed that after the death of Ian Curtis in 1980, a pattern of reissues was set [...]

Reply to this Admin

The Smoking Cupcake
Nov 4, 2008 10:17pm

A little hard on the Gallaghers aren't we? I mean, facts are facts, albums 3 through whatever are indeed trainwrecks, but no.s 1 and 2 were spot on. Unless my math is wrong, that falls into the same rotation of Joy Division records.

Reply to this Admin