The Quietus - A new rock music and pop culture website

Black Sky Thinking

How The Beta Male Got His Revenge On Hollywood
Darren Lee, September 16th, 2008 23:11

The Geek Shall Inherit The Earth: Darren Lee looks back on how the beta male took his revenge on Hollywood

Add your comment »

The unmistakable scent of the beta male currently hangs over Hollywood: that pungent aroma of ripe B.O., stale hashish and semen-encrusted tissue making tinsel town smell like a teenage boy’s bedroom. Improbable as it all sounds, the uber-nerd slackers with the unhealthy porn obsession and an attitude to personal hygiene which might charitably be described as laissez-faire are busy re-defining the conventions of the male romantic lead. For evidence, look no further than this autumn’s release schedule: Pineapple Express, How to Lose Friends and Alienate People, Sex Drive, Choke, Zach and Miri Make A Porno, these are all films characterised by their male leads behaving badly and not only getting away with it, but walking off with the girl to boot. The slobbish, immature, emotionally-stunted, sex-crazed male is very much in the ascendancy, and there’s nothing anyone can do about it.

It wasn’t always thus. Once upon a time in Hollywood, the beta male knew his place. An object of pity and general derision, he would invariably play second fiddle to his chisel-jawed, contact sport-loving, all-American alpha male peers. What romantically frustrated adolescent male couldn’t relate to Duckie in John Hughes’ brat pack classic Pretty in Pink as he moped in his bedroom, nonchalantly flicking playing cards into the bin as Morrissey pleaded “please, please, please let me get what I want” in the background? What Duckie wanted was Molly Ringwald, and we knew that his cause was hopeless, a lifetime’s worth of bitter tears and solitary masturbation his only meagre consolation. Very occasionally (The Revenge of the Nerds, Weird Science) the sex-starved nerds would take centre stage and actually get some action, but there was tacit acknowledgment from the viewer that this was just outlandish male wish fulfillment run rampant, the stuff of cable porn fantasy.

Then, something changed: a generation of beta male directors rose to prominence and decided to metaphorically piss all over the rule book, celebrating the unreconstructed male in all his boorish glory. Firstly, there was Kevin Smith, whose no-budget 1994 slacker comedy Clerks ingeniously tapped into that instantly-recognisable strain of Y-chromosome geekdom. There was nothing refined, hip or remotely debonair about his convenience store anti-heroes Dante and Randal, who not only acknowledged their limited prospects and beta male status, but seemed to positively revel in it, filling the emotional void with crude sexual put-downs and trivia-fixated banter.

With cheery serendipity, Clerks word-of-mouth success coincided with the rise of the archetypal video store geek, Quentin Tarantino, whose obsessive pop culture referencing and smash-and-grab pillaging of the cult movies of his (misspent) youth made him the hottest property in Hollywood. To paraphrase Huey Lewis and the News, it was suddenly hip to be square.

Smith continued to reap comic reward from his seemingly inexhaustible well of male inadequacy in hits such as Mallrats, Chasing Amy and Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back, albeit with diminishing returns. By the time of his lukewarmly-received Clerks sequel in 2006, however, a usurper by the name of Judd Apatow had assumed his mantle as pre-eminent champion of the beta male.

Together with long-term collaborators Evan Goldberg and Seth Rogen, Apatow hit upon a winning and highly lucrative combination of coarse humour and goofy sentimentality. 2005 sleeper hit The 40-Year-Old Virgin established the formula, realising the rich comic potential in the sexual travails of the beta male, as goading work colleagues sought to transform Steve Carrell’s virginal loser into an unlikely lothario. Similar themes were subsequently revisited and expanded upon in a string of critically-acclaimed hits: Superbad chronicled the exploits of horny high-school losers embarking on a seemingly doomed mission to get laid; in Knocked Up Seth Rogen’s oafish protagonist improbably manages to first impregnate and than melt the heart of prim, sophisticated Katherine Heigl; recent efforts Forgetting Sarah Marshall and Pineapple Express continued the tradition of flawed but essentially likeable beta male losers punching way above their weight in the romance department.

Not that the runaway success and ubiquity of team Apatow has been met with universal approval. Heigl herself sparked frenzied debate last year when she admitted in a Vanity Fair interview that she found Knocked Up “a little sexist”, claiming that it "paints the women as shrews, as humourless and uptight, and it paints the men as lovable, goofy, fun-loving guys”. By any objective reading, it’s hard to dispute this contention. But, for my money at least, accusations of misogyny are wide of the mark. Knocked Up and similar efforts from the Apatow stable represent nothing more complex or sinister than exercises in beta male wish fulfilment, the revenge of the nerd after years of neglect and ritual humiliation by Hollywood. In this alternative reality, smart, beautiful women are drawn to the bumbling charms and bawdy humour of socially awkward, unconventionally attractive men ahead of the guile, erudition and brawn of more obviously eligible candidates. This holds an obvious aspirational appeal to a male audience, who can help assuage memories of their own romantic disappointments by rooting for the plucky underdog in his efforts to bag the girl in spite of his manifold deficiencies. The appeal to women is more difficult to discern: could it be that female audiences are simply bored rigid by the patronising and two-dimensional representations of male desirability as foisted upon them by assembly-line romcoms, and crave slightly more realistic romantic leads? Then again, maybe that’s simply indulging in a spot of wish fulfilment of my own.

Read our review of Heavy Metal In Baghdad here and check out our top ten metal films.


mariken lamers
Sep 18, 2008 9:17am

Makes one (well, me) wonder if, in a remake of Pretty in Pink, Ducky would get the girl this time round.
However, Jon Cryer is currently playing Beta-male to Charlie Sheen's Alpha in Two-and-a-half Men, so I guess not that much has changed after all.
On the other hand, nerds have been around the movies for a while now: Woody Allen and Steven Spielberg come to mind. And one need only look at Steve Jobs and/or Bill Gates to realise that not Woman, but Nerd will eventually inherit the earth.

Reply to this Admin

James Jones
Sep 18, 2008 9:28am

I think the appeal to women is not so difficult to discern. Perhaps they're realizing that those Alpha males who are oh-so-studly are studly to a LOT of women. Instead of pairing themselves with serial cheaters who think of their girlfriends as status objects, women are realizing that perhaps caring and sympathetic life partners (beta males) make for better relationships in the long run.

This is not to say that beta males couldn't do with a few lessons in manners and comportment -- but the thing is, a lot of these guys know it, and would gladly become more refined and appealing, if someone only told them how. Beta males are very malleable when they're in love, and gladly and willingly become more presentable if a woman cares enough to prompt them in that direction.

Reply to this Admin

Lynsey Andrew
Sep 18, 2008 10:21am

For me the only difference between Beta males and Alpha males is confidence. Alpha males never doubt themselves (and get over-confident a lot of the time), Beta males used to always doubt themselves even when they were winning.

Alpha is the finished product so don't all males eventually become Alpha?

Reply to this Admin

Amy Massey
Sep 18, 2008 10:35am

Women are the future!

Reply to this Admin

Libby Brown
Sep 18, 2008 1:22pm

Here's a point I think is being missed about the women. The issue isn't the women being hooked up with one type of guy or another. Girls' tastes differ. Some would prefer an alpha male, some prefer beta males. The issue is the fact that the women are in these stories primarily as sexual objects for the men and are otherwise unappealing characters. Personally as a woman the main thing I want to see is realistic, well-rounded female characters who add to the plot something other than a pretty body to act as a MacGuffin. Otherwise I don't object to the beta male at all; he's an entertaining character, and if he ends up with the girl it is a fitting reward, I'd just like to see a better kind of girl.

Reply to this Admin

Name Withheld
Sep 18, 2008 1:55pm

mariken lamers, it's funny you should mention that, because that was the original ending. Test Audiences didn't respond well to it and it was reshot. It certainly explains why Blaine's hair looks so odd at the end.

Reply to this Admin

Stuart Weightman
Sep 18, 2008 2:21pm

If you want another good example, wait until you see Dance of the Dead (Gregg Bishop)!

Reply to this Admin

Natalie Hewitt
Sep 18, 2008 2:36pm

In reply to Libby Brown:

I completely agree. When does Hollywood get to see the revenge of the Beta-female?

Reply to this Admin

Kevin The Man
Sep 18, 2008 3:08pm

I generally enjoy these movies, but I do see them kinda of becoming the equivalent of "chick flicks" just funnier and more creative. This is for the fact that these so called "beta males" act like themselves in get the girl. I feel this causing men who relate to these characters to become delusional on their romantic prospects. While most women say they want the "beta males" type they end up with alpha males or usually the middle of road (ie no personality) males. I definitely believe that their are women that like that type the are just few and far between or not that attractive and will take anything.

Reply to this Admin

Steve B
Sep 18, 2008 3:18pm

You are forgetting the ultimate beta male, Homer Simpson. He is a 'loser with a heart of gold'. Well gold electro plate.

Reply to this Admin

Bobby Elllis
Sep 18, 2008 3:59pm

I think this whole article is flawed based on the fact that you fail to recognize that all the films you make reference to are comedies and the "beta male" has always been the protagonist or object of affection (or EVENTUAL object of affection) whereas other genres have not really broken away from the alpha male in this respect.

Reply to this Admin

Kim H
Sep 18, 2008 5:16pm

is he calling james franco a girl? bc I don't remember seth rogen "getting the girl" in pineapple express

Reply to this Admin

J Morrow
Sep 18, 2008 5:30pm

In reply to Natalie Hewitt:

Well, guys are a harder sell than girls. We're not quite ready to root for the ugly chick yet. Note the success of Sarah Palin and failure of Hillary Clinton.

Reply to this Admin

John Doran
Sep 18, 2008 5:56pm

It's true that the modern cinematic beta female doesn't follow the same plot arc as her male counterpart. Miranda July in 'You, Me and Everyone We Know' or Thora Birch in 'Ghostworld' . . .

That said I just think it's penny pinching on the part of Hollywood. Why commission a film where guys talk about their feelings, turn their backs on their juvenile lives and come good in the end while commissioning a film full of farting, bong smoking and jokes about tits when you can . . . commission a Judd Apatow flick.

Reply to this Admin

Benedict Smith
Dec 17, 2008 4:52pm

this is simply an extension of the sit-com formula: stupid husband with hot and smart wife with more earning potential than he that puts up with his hi-jinx. they can "inherit" the title while some alpha male is banging their wife/girlfr on the side and rationalizing it to themselves.

Reply to this Admin

Mason Blank
Dec 19, 2008 6:59am

There are definitely "Beta Girls" in Hollywood. E.g. Toni Collette in "Muriel's Wedding", Rachel Leigh Cook in "She's All That", Geena Davis in "Thelma and Louise", Drew Barrymore in "Never Been Kissed", etc. But for whatever reason they don't seem to have the same cultural impact as guy-geek films.

Reply to this Admin