The Quietus | Features | Metallica - . . . And Reviews For All!

Metallica - . . . And Reviews For All!
John Doran, June 12th, 2008 11:08

Just over a month ago we were indulging in our favourite office based pastimes – arguing about Gary Numan, eating fine cheese and pickle and drinking Jagermeister under our desks – when a couple of colleagues rang to say they were attending the first play back of the Metallica album in the world, and would we like a review.

Through a mouthful of Cornish yarg and damson chutney we said "Yes please". The next day we were proud editors of an optimistically positive review (Metallica's guy who brought the tape over only played them six tracks) along with Metal Hammer and Rock Sound.

A few hours later all hell broke loose. The phone was ringing red hot with people demanding that we take it down and telling us that all the other websites had complied. But by this time the band had gotten involved and things had just started to get interesting. The full, unhinged story is below...

And the plot thickens... It turns out that Metallica have no problem with early reviews running at all, according to a statement by the band themselves. Because of their magnanimous behaviour we'd like to apologize for suggesting that they were insane and for claiming that they hadn't done a good album since the tragic death of Cliff Burton - arrant nonsense by anyone's standards, let alone our own. In a statement that says the four Danishmen of the Rockopalypse only came back off tour on Tuesday, so have only just become aware of Flamingogate. They go onto state that they had to say to their management company Q Prime: "WHY?!!! Why take down mostly positive reviews of the new material and prevent people from getting psyched about the next record. . . that makes no sense to us!”" In this same spirit we'd cautiously like to say thanks to Metallica for seeing sense, we'd also hope that James doesn't 'accidentally' mistake Q Prime for an ursine invasion and take his mighty bear-cannon to them.

So now that everyone's friends again, it beehooves us to say: From the smallest, newest blog in the world to the biggest, most famous heavy metal band on the planet . . . Come on Metallica - where's our interview?

METALLICA: New Album Preview by Bob Mulhouse

Being a fan of the Danish-Californian heavy metal quartet Metallica is hard work. They’re the quintessential band of two halves, pulling in millions of fans from 1983 to 1995 with five mostly excellent albums, which ranged in approach from youthful violence to radio-friendly hummability. In 1996, however, Metallica released the first of a shockingly poor string of alternative-rock, covers and live records, finishing up with 2003’s terrible St. Anger, the most disappointing metal CD ever released. Staying loyal to them after this many years isn’t easy, frankly.

So what, you might be thinking " all bands have their creative peaks and troughs, surely? Well, you’re not getting it. Metallica aren’t just a metal act: they are the Led Zeppelin of their generation, a band which your kids will revere 30 years from now to the same degree as we do the Beatles and the Stones today. To love them is to really love them. Their work ethic (which other band spends three years on the road at stadium level?) and their damnable songwriting ability (leading to songs of visceral power which you can still sing in the bath) has made them bigger, heavier and more essentially here than anyone else. That’s why we still pay attention to them after more than a decade of recorded dross. That’s why even their drummer Lars Ulrich’s petulant sparring with Napster in 2001 and the painful-to-watch Some Kind Of Monster documentary (made during their group-therapy sessions) don’t outweigh the hope we all felt when it was announced in 2007 that none other than Rick Rubin would be helming their new studio album, the first in five years.

Rick Rubin, as any fule kno, is responsible for launching the careers of many a fine band (including Slayer, Metallica’s sometime contemporaries), but " more relevantly in this case " has also revived the fortunes of creatively ossified artists whose moment in the sun has passed, such as Johnny Cash and the Red Hot Chili Peppers. Could The Beastie Beard breathe life into Metallica? God, we hoped so, simultaneously aware that Ulrich et al have raised and dashed our hopes before.

It was with some trepidation, therefore, that I attended the playback of Metallica’s new album at the HQ of Universal, their UK record company, on 3 June. We were permitted to hear six of the 10 tracks which will ultimately appear on the album " which, a rep from the Q-Prime management company informed us, is referred to colloquially by Metallica as ’Nine epics and one song’. The sense of occasion was reinforced by the presence of almost the entire editorial teams of the UK’s two biggest metal magazines, glaring at each other over the tea urn.

Right from the off, it’s a relief to hear that the utterly awful production of St. Anger is no more. Ulrich has replaced the old dustbin lid from that album with an actual snare drum, and the sound is fresh, clean and resonant (even though the songs are still only rough mixes at this stage). The first song, like the rest of the ’epics’, is between six and eight minutes long and begins with a bass intro from low-ender extraordinaire Robert Trujillo. Moving rapidly from riff to riff, the song bursts with energy and ideas: singer and rhythm guitarist James Hetfield barks “Luck runs out!” repeatedly and throws in some twisty, semi-progressive riffs which could have been lifted directly from, their last truly good album, 1988’s |And Justice For All. Guitarist Kirk Hammett, who was banned from soloing on St. Anguish for no adequately explored reason, is on fire, whipping out the melodic, rapid-fire shreds for which he is famous over an extended solo section " almost as if he’s making up for lost time. This is Metallica’s best song in ages, perhaps since the 1980s.

The next song has a working title of 'Flamingo' and is going to be the first single. Now, Metallica’s lead singles have been breathtakingly crap since 1995, so it was a relief to hear that 'Flamingo' (as it almost definitely will not be called) is a modernised take on their amazing 1988 song One, all balladry at its front end before a speeded-up metalstorm at the back. Hetfield delivers a clean-picked intro which reminded me of the Beach Boys (I know| but I only got to hear it once, all right?) before the body of the song, which is basically like 'The Unforgiven' from 1991’s ’Black Album’. If you’re familiar with the chord progression behind the solo in 'Am I Evil?', the ancient Diamond Head song which Metallica made their own, you’ll be able to picture the under-solo riffage in this song " all simple, effective major-interval jumps.

However, let us not forget that this is modern Metallica " and the next two songs are much less fun. The first, which may be called 'We Die Hard' judging by the frequency with which Hetfield barks the phrase, starts boringly but accelerates halfway through and enters slightly proggy territory, all stop-start riff stabs and a clever time signature. The next song is very . . . And Justice . . ., a lengthy, unhurried workout which revolves around the line “Bow down / Sell your soul to me / I will set you free”, itself a 1988 line if I ever heard one. Apart from dexterous soloing from Hammett, it’s not great.

So far, we’ve had two good songs and two dull ones " not a bad track record for new ’Tallica, believe me. However, track five is tedious, a combination of the aimless riffery of St. Anger and the pointless rock chorusing of Load, the album which almost finished Metallica in 1996. “Crying, weeping, shedding strife!” sings Hetfield in that slick 'Enter Sandman' manner, over an unthreatening clean midsection which would (and no doubt will) suit VH1 down to the ground. At this point the Q-Prime geezer asks us if we want to hear more, and fortunately we say yes " because the final song (and indeed, it is ’The Song’, the little guy among the nine epics) is great, a genuine slice of thrash metal that starts fast and stays that way. Like a slower, less precise 'Battery' (the opening track of 1986’s flawless Master Of Puppets album), the song nips in and out, not outstaying its welcome and proving that on some level, Metallica still have the necessary vitriol to impress their older fans. OK, it reminded me a bit of 'Dyer’s Eve', the last song on Justice, which had a kind of “I suppose we’d better do a fast one for the fans” feel about it " but in 2008, Hetfield and Ulrich delivering any form of thrash metal is not to be sneered at.

We file out of the listening room, not saying much. This album could be good, or it could be mediocre " too much depends on the other four songs to make a call at this point. I try not to agonise about it, but this matters, damn it. It really does. I said it wasn’t easy being a Metallica fan in 2008, didn’t I?

For Henry Cutmore's review, please visit our friends at Thrash Hits

Sign up to our mailing list for a concise chronicle of the latest content from the sputtering orifice that is TheQuietus.com each and every week

Add your comment » Read all 36 comments »

Tommy Udo
Jun 12, 2008 11:44am

But don't you get the feeling that this is all part of some Byzantine strategy worked out by a bunch of LA cunt lawyers and marketing vermin a few months ago? Y'know, an opportunity for Metallica to show how down with the kids they are that they're standing up to their own management who are just too darn old school fuddy duddy to understand this here interweb malarkey. Please sue their bloated arses for restraint of trade.

Metallica - . . . And Reviews For All! John Doran, June 12th, 2008 11:08

Metallica - . . . And Reviews For All!
John Doran, June 12th, 2008 11:08